The judge says Apple must stop the sales commissions of shops that are not applied

Apple Inc. Inc. He violated a court order that demanded that the APP store open in external payment options and stop collecting commissions on purchases outside his software market, said a federal judge in a forceful sentence that he sent to the company to prosecutors for a possible criminal probe.

The Judge of the North -American District, Yvonne Gonzalez RogersFortniteMaker Epic Games Inc., due to his complaint, that the iPhone manufacturer did not comply with an order he issued in 2021 after finding the company dedicated to anticompetive conduct in violation of the California law.

Gonzalez Rogers also sent the case to federal prosecutors to investigate if Apple committed a criminal disregard for the court for avoiding his judgment in 2021.

The judge found that Apple “voluntarily” violated his order.

“He did so with the express intention of creating new anticompetive barriers, which, by design and, in fact, would maintain a valued revenue flow; a flow of revenue that was formerly anticompetes,” he wrote in his sentence. “I thought this court would tolerate this insubordination was a bad calculation.”

Apple did not respond immediately to a comment request.

Tim Sweeney, Epic chief executive, said in a social media post that the company will return Fortnite In the United States App Store store next week.

Following a trial in 2021, Gonzalez Rogers largely stood with Apple, saying that his App Store policies did not violate the federal antimonopoli law. However, it required the company to allow developers to overlook their payment tool to the application to avoid a commission of up to 30%. The sentence was defended by the Supreme Court of the United States.

Apple allowed developers to point out users on the web to complete the transactions for purchases in the application, but required developers to pay the company a 27% reduction in revenue they generated.

For several weeks of audiences in February and last year, Gonzalez Rogers seemed skeptical of Apple’s compliance and questioned if it was improperly the information, saying the confidentiality of the client-client.

In Wednesday’s ruling, the judge said Apple sought to cover his breach with his order of 2021.

“After two ensembles of obvious audiences, the truth arose,” wrote Gonzalez Rogers. “Apple, despite knowing his obligations, frustrated the goals of the order and continued his anticompetive behavior only to maintain his revenue flow.”

The judge said Alex Roman, Apple’s Vice President of Finance, lied to the witness’s grandstand.

The case is Epic Games Inc. Against Apple Inc., 20-CV-05640, United States District Court, Northern California District (Oakland).

This story originally presented to Fortune.com

Source link