Northeastern student College requested their registration fees after catching his teacher using Openai Chatgpt

• A Senior from Northern University -East filed a formal complaint And he demanded a refund of the enrollment after discovering that his teacher secretly used AI tools to generate notes. The professor later admitted to using several AI platforms and acknowledged the need for transparency. The incident highlights the growing concerns of students about the AS teachers, a reversal of the previous concerns of teachers concerned that students use the technology to deceive.

Some students are not happy with the use of their teacher’s AI. One from the university was so shocked to learn that her teacher was using AI to help you create notes that she filed a formal complaint and requested a refund of the money from her enrollment, according to the New York Times.

She, Stapleton, who enrolled at Northern University -this academic year, distrusted his business professor’s conference notes when he saw Ai’s generation generation generation signs, including a “Chatgpt” quote lost in the bibliography, shortened shorts that reflected the departures of machines and images that represented additional limbs.

“He tells us that we do not use it and then uses him himself,” Stapleton said in a Interview with the New York Times.

Stauleton filed a formal complaint to Northeastern Business School for the incident, focused on the non -disseminated use of his teacher’s AI along with broader concerns about his teaching approach, and demanded a refund of the enrollment for this course. The claim was ascending to just over $ 8,000.

After a series of meetings, Northeastern finally decided to reject the senior’s claim.

The teacher behind the notes, Rick Arrowood, acknowledged that he used several tools in the IA, including Chatgpt, the perplexity AI search engine and a presentation generator of the AI ​​called Gamma, in an interview with an interview with an interview The New York Times.

“In the later view … I would like to have a look more closely,” he said to the starting point, adding that he now believes that teachers should carefully think of the integration of the AI ​​and be transparent with students about when and how they use it.

“If my experience can be something that people can learn,” the Now“Then, of course, this is my happy place.”

Colleges often restrict the use of IA on campus

Many schools directly prohibit or put restrictions on the use of the AI. Students were some of the first Chatgpt adopters after their launch in late 2022, finding rapidly that they could complete rehearsals and tasks in seconds. The widespread use of technology created a mistrust between students and teachers, as teachers struggled to identify and punish the use of AI at work.

Now the tables have turned a little. Students have been taking places, including my teachers to complain -the use of their teachers or excessive use of the AI. They also argue that it hurts the fees they pay to be taught by human experts instead of the technology they could use for free.

According to North AI policy -Est, Any faculty or student must “provide an appropriate attribution when using an AI system to generate content included in an academic publication or sent to any person, publication or other organization that requires attribution of the content authorship”.

The policy also states that those who use the technology must: “Regularly check the output and adaptation of the AI ​​system for accuracy and adequacy for the required purpose and review/update the exit as appropriate.”

Northern representatives -East did not immediately respond to a comment request from Fortune.

This story originally presented to Fortune.com