Migrants in the United Kingdom since 2020 are facing 5 years of waiting to obtain settlement

Unlock Free

Roula Khalaf, publisher of the FT, selects her favorite stories in this weekly newsletter.

Hundreds of thousands of people who have moved to Britain since 2020 with a potential path to the permanent settlement in five years, they have the risk of having to wait another half decade under the migration repression of Sir Keir Starmer.

One of the Pillars of the Prime Minister Reform packageEstablished on Monday, it is a dubbing of the predetermined period that migrants have to go to live and work in the United Kingdom before they can request -to remain indefinitely.

This state of “liquidation” opens the eligibility for benefits and a path to the citizenry and takes five years to most migrants at present, but in the future it will have up to 10.

Under current plans, start secretary Yvette Cooper It intends that this policy be applied to people who are already in the United Kingdom, according to those who reported their thinking, despite concerns between government officials on possible legal challenges.

Experts have also warned that politics, which was Been in a white bookIt will not help integrate and only increase the income of the home office from the prolonged period during which migrants have to pay commissions.

It Home office On Sunday he told The Financial Times that politics would not be replicated retrospectively to the people already in the United Kingdom, as the courts could govern this illegal.

But a person close to Cooper said on Wednesday that, according to current plans, liquidation applications submitted after the point where the most restrictive policy came into force in the new rules “regardless of when the person arrived in the country.”

Settlement applications are usually made at the end of the five-year period when a migrant has lived in the United Kingdom.

The person, however, added that the home office did not yet have to confirm when the new rules would come into force, suggesting that people who approached the five -year period could soon save.

Madeleine Sumption, director of the Oxford University Migration Observatory, said that proposals meant about 1 kilometer that could have been expected to receive settlement in the coming years, however, would have to wait another half decade.

The figure, based on rough calculations, is mainly made up of people with specialized workers visas, but also includes refugees and those of specific Hong Kong visa routes.

Starmer allies said that the new rules would be applied to people from the moment they are introduced, but that there would be a consultation to ensure that they were introduced “fairly”, with some mitigation for people approaching the term.

Ministers acknowledge that some families could be making plans for a permanent life in Britain, for example, making school applications, which could be questioned by change.

“Someone may have been here for four and a half years and begins to organize their lives,” said an ally of the Prime Minister. “We need to ensure that it is done fairly.”

Between 2020 and 2024, 605,000 people received a resolved state in the United Kingdom, including 162,000 people in the last twelve months, according to data from the Home Office.

The Government plans to consult at the end of the year on the details of the new requirements, including how migrants could accommodate a faster route to the settlement based on their contributions to the economy and society.

Starmer’s reforms and the hard rhetoric warned that Britain took a risk of “strangers” without shares, after the Nigel Farage anti-immigration reform party made great gains in the local English elections this month.

The reform is now significantly ahead of labor and conservatives in opinion polls, approximately 29 percent.

Cooper said to Parliament on Monday: “We will find out more details of the liquidation reforms and citizenship won by the end of this year and will consult them.”

Immigration lawyers said that they were flooding in queries from people and entrepreneurs concerned about what the change might mean.

Colin Yeo, a lawyer and champion specializing in immigration law, said that while the retrospective application of politics could meet legal challenges, “the general rule is that the home office can do it.”

The result of the challenges would depend on whether the migrants passing through particular visa routes had received explicit promises of the terms in which they would be allowed to request the liquidation at that time, he said.

Although it was “fundamentally unfair” that migrants who were often highly qualified, with options to work in many countries, had taken an informed choice to come to the United Kingdom only to find that the rules had changed under them, Yeo added.

Professor Brian Bell, chairman of the Government Migration Advisory Committee, said that there was no obvious advantage in extending the path to settlement for people who were already in the country and probably remaining because they would make it difficult for them to succeed in their career.