Kemi Badenoch accepted the trade agreement trade, according to Indian officials

Keep –Logs informed with free updates

Simply register —vos at Indian Business & Finance Myft Digest: Delivered directly to the inbox.

Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has been accused by Indian officials of talking about “rubbish” after she denounced the “two -level” fiscal agreement in the heart of the United Kingdom’s commercial agreement/India negotiated by Sir Keir Starmer.

New Delhi officials insist Badenoch He agreed to give Indian employees in the United Kingdom relief of the British national insurance rate during his time as commercial and commercial secretary to the last conservative government.

“It’s amazing,” said a high Indian official. “It was on the table when he was a commercial secretary.”

Britain offered Indian workers a two -year national insurance, while Badenoch was responsible for trade conversations, but India wanted a four -year exemption, according to New Delhi officials. Starmer agreed on a three -year commitment In the deal It was presented on Tuesday.

“The Tories offered us two years, but we said it was not enough,” said the Indian official. “They put it on the table. We wanted more than three, but the principle had already been granted in exchange for some donations to our services to the services.”

Indian officials say the trade agreement was “made 95 percent”, while Badenoch was a business secretary in the Rishi Sunak government, but negotiations stopped due to the elections of the two countries.

Badenoch has strongly criticized the national insurance element of the trade agreement. “This is two -level two -level taxes,” he tweeted, and added that he refused to sign the agreement.

Badenoch’s spokesman denied the Indian tale of Ni negotiations, saying, “The Indians put it on the table and Kemi said no. Therefore, we did not sign the agreement.

“The first principle of Kemi with trade agreements was that they had to be goods and services and nothing about immigration, beyond very short and limited business mobility visas.”

India promoted severely during the three -year negotiations for the “double contribution convention”, which will give Indian businessmen to the United Kingdom of the National Insurance Tax of Britain paid by companies.

The agreement to prevent double taxation also covers the contributions of or paid by employees, and the estimate that will reduce the costs for companies that occupy Indian workers published in the United Kingdom of around 20 percent.

Badenoch did not raise the Indian commercial agreement on Wednesday to the Prime Minister’s questions, with several higher conservatives who publicly approved the result of discussions.

The Prime Minister said the deputies: “The agreement with India is a great victory for the people working in this country.” He added: “It is the largest trade agreement that the United Kingdom has given since we left the EU.”

Starmer said that the critique of the double taxation agreement was “incoherent nonsense”, adding that he was part of the agreements that Britain already had with 50 more countries. He challenged Badenoch to say if he will drag them.

Following the Prime Minister’s questions, Badenoch’s spokesman asked the Government to rapidly publish a full impact assessment, both at the cost of double taxation agreement to the United Kingdom Exchek and the probable change in the number of Indian workers arriving in the United Kingdom.

“There must be a complete evaluation of what will cost this and how many people will carry this,” said Badenoch’s spokesman.

Previously, Sir Oliver Dowden, ex -Viceprimer Minister of Tory, welcomed the agreement, writing Ax That “is based on the significant advances made by the previous conservative government”.

Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg, the former Brexiter business secretary, told X: “Food and cheaper drink, including rice and tea, footwear and clothing thanks to a commercial agreement welcome with India. Exactly what Brexit promised.”